Firstly, there is affirmatives and negatives to freedom of movement. I am going to analyse both sides of the argument and dissect all of the points.
My first point is that you’d earn respect from the people that do support free movement, which is a fair few people. Secondly, your nation would be seen as a safe haven for asylum seekers. On the Contrast, if too many immigrants see your nation as a safe haven, it will overflow and experience famine on an unprecedented level, which I will address now.
As compared to Aff, Negative has a lot more plausible reasons. First, the country, as aforementioned, would experience terrible drought and never-seen-before famine.
Secondly, there would be a vicious cycle as shown below
1st stage: The immigrants would move and settle.
2nd stage: Too many immigrants because they’d have settled well.
3rd stage: Famine would come knocking on the door amd the middle class would shatter,leaving a fine line between rich and poor.
4th stage: Everyone leaves the place and it becomes a developing country again.
I feel there is no real answer for free movement. What can we do? Let the Public Decide.