Rakhine State: Country of Asia?

2018-Issue1_Featured-Myanmar_9.jpg

I think Rakhine State should be a country by itself. It should urgently become a country so they can have peace.

Flashback:

The Rohingya are not accepted in Myanmar because of different religions and Myanmar people say the Rohingya are from Bangladesh.

TheMyanmar milatary set fire to Rohingyan homes which caused the Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh where they're not accepted because of extra work for the government there. The Rohingya are living in refugee camps where food is hrdly given.

So both contries don't accept the Rohingya. If the Rohingya go back to Myanmar an demand independence, obviously the Myanmar government will declare it. Then the Rohingya will be happy on their own with no other goverment to bother them. Happily ever after!

BUT who will be their leader?

PLEASE commet on my writing. You could find out the nominees for future president.

Comments (1)

  • St-Josephs-Northfleet-logo-250x250.jpg energetic_conversation
    St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, Northfleet3 days, 4 hours ago

    I agree on the fact that the Rohingya, having their own country, might bring peace... Though at the same time it might not! I have been considering a few downsides and here they are:

    The Rohingya are a slightly small minority so it wouldn't be hard for the Military to take over their country and turn their lives into another nightmare.
    Some of the Rohingya are the rebels that attacked the Military in the first place so they might be wanting revenge by attacking the innocent people of Myanmar.
    HOW ON EARTH ARE THE ROHINGYA GOING TO GET THEIR OWN COUNTRY!?

    Please consider these points and I'd like to know your answer to my las question.

    Reply to this comment

You must be logged in to post a comment