People have argued for centuries about what 'art' is. You're now joining these debates through your Burnet News Club sessions!
There have been lots of different ideas:
....some say that if something is recognised as art, that makes it art
....some say art must be a result of a deliberate decision to make art
....others have argued that if an artwork shares a feature with another existing piece of art, then its also art
Some people argue there are too many kinds of art to come up with an overall definition, and a meaning that covers everything is impossible to pin down.
What do you think of the definitions above? Are any of them good enough to cover all art? And ultimately...